La Tour, Maurice-Quentin de

From Enlightenment and Revolution
Revision as of 19:58, 12 March 2017 by Toubiana (talk | contribs) (New page: '''La Tour, Maurice-Quentin de''' (1704-1788): Painter, French Maurice-Quentin de Latour was born the 5th of September in Saint-Quentin in Picardy, Northern France, third son to François...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

La Tour, Maurice-Quentin de (1704-1788): Painter, French

Maurice-Quentin de Latour was born the 5th of September in Saint-Quentin in Picardy, Northern France, third son to François de La Tour, trumpeter in the Duc de Maine’s regiment and later musician. Maurice-Quentin went to school in Saint-Quentin but spent much of his time drawing and copying prints rather than studying. In 1719, he goes to Paris and is taken as a student by the painter Claude Dupouch. At 18 years of age, he meets a famous engraver, Nicolas Tardieu who helps him meet other painters. Maurice-Quentin’s attempts to work as an assistant to established painters are each time met with refusal until he makes the acquaintance of Jacques-Jean Spoëde, a Flemish artist who introduces him to the works of Rubens and Van Dyck. It is unknown when La Tour leaves Spoëde’s studio but in 1723, he is already back in Saint-Quentin and has an affair with his cousin, Anne Bougier, who will carry his illegitimate child, born dead. That incident forces him to leave his hometown and moves to Cambrai where representatives from the king of Spain and the Holy Roman Emperor meet to end the Anglo-Spanish war. La Tour has his first success with the portrait of the Spanish delegate which favorably impressed the English delegation. It is believed that he therefore receives an invitation to England. Another explanation to his departure for London is that in Cambrai, he falls in love with a married woman who tricks him into coming to her house for a nightly rendezvous but the woman and her husband dupe La Tour and manage to let him hang into a basket outside her house between two floors. Embarrassed and humiliated, he decides to leave for London. In England, he grows into a successful portraitist renowned for achieving very good resemblance. He chooses rather pastel than oil because this medium does not require many sittings since there is no need to wait for the canvass to dry. In 1727, he is back in Paris and devotes much of his time to perfect his drawing ability. His first recognized major work takes place in 1737 with his self-portrait, L’Homme qui rit, with the Royal Academy of Painting and Sculpture. He, then, sends a second painting to the judges, a portrait of Mme Boucher, which grants him the position of Associate at the Academy. From 1738, the artist’s recognition is ensured with successful portraits such as the ones of Mademoiselle de la Boissière and Jean Restout. His exceptional knowledge of color and texture bring him much success. The public appreciates the depth and intimacy captured in the human face by the new artist en vogue. In addition to the likeness of his portraits, La Tour strives to catch the touch, vitality and personality that differentiate each of his sitters in life. In the salon of 1739, two of his drawings consecrate him as the portraitist of his time, Father Fiacre and Claude Dupouch (his former teacher and painter at the Academy of Saint Luc). He is then in demand with the nobles and the influential people of Paris. A year later, he is portraying Louis XV and his family. However, in spite of his fame, he worries about losing his celebrity and his income specifically because he realizes that his popularity might only be temporary and also because many critics believe pastel inferior to oil. In 1741, to prove his detractors wrong, he undertakes on a very large scale, a portrait of the judge, President de Rieux, 74” high on 56” wide. The work is considered a masterpiece because of its precision, likeness and realism, it matches any oil work using simple colorful pastels. In the salon of 1745, more pastels of Louis XV, the dauphin and many other prominent aristocrats and state men grant him a personal studio in the Louvre only reserved for the best artists of the period. The powerful nobles of Europe turn to him to have their portrait done and critics recognize that he can seize the physiognomy but also the character of his sitters in his work. One of his gifts resides in his faculty to capture the psychology of his models through the expression he puts in their eyes. He is then promoted Premier Painter to the king. He also paints the great military men of France, the most famous being the ones for the Marshal of Saxe for whom he made several portraits. He also draws of one of the most famous woman of France, Mme de Pompadour, Louis XV’s mistress who holds in her hands much of France’s politics. In 1750, he meets Marie Fel, an opera singer nine years younger than he. She had been unsuccessfully courted before by other artists, Grimm being one of them. Fel’s becomes the pastellist’s devoted companion until the latter’s health degraded and must return to his native Saint-Quentin before his death. His passion for his art is well illustrated by a significant episode while making Mme de Pompadour’s portrait. One of his conditions had been he would suffer no interruption during the sitting. However, when the king dares enter the room, La Tour stops his work for the day and exits the room impatiently reminding Mme de Pompadour in front of the king his prerequisite. La Tour was known to be direct even with the highest political leaders like the king himself. In 1752, he receives a royal pension that ensures his old days. La Tour’s works can be regarded as a collection of the most important and famous people during Louis XV’s reign. The draughtsman was very sensitive to the hardship and suffering of the masses and developed friendship with the Encyclopaedists such as the philosophes Voltaire, Rousseau, d’Alembert, Helvétius and theater’ and opera’s idols like La Camargo who was also painted by Lancret, Nicolas. In 1766, he travels to Holland and visits Amsterdam, the Hague and Utrecht. In Utrecht, he meets one of the most famous Dutch writer of the Enlightenment, Isabelle de Charriere, also known as “la belle de Zuylen,” of whom he will make a famous portrait. Back in Paris, La Tour continues to paint and exhibits many pieces in the salons of 1769, 1771, and 1773. In his later years, his production slows down and the artist is more preoccupied in retouching portraits that had been previously finished and even delivered to their owner. La Tour feels he must make alterations because he cannot find his original inspiration. He realizes that he is searching an excellence that is beyond human skill. Already in his seventies, he becomes very involved in charity. He founded a free school of paintings, give large sums to maternity hospitals, and of course does not forget his relatives, his friends and his faithful companion, Marie Fel. La Tour seems to have lost touch with reality hoping to contribute to an impossible ambition where human kind would be linked through love and charity. On June 20, 1784 he leaves Marie Fel and returns to his native Saint-Quentin where most inhabitants are out greeting him and thanking him for his generosity. Later on, he loses his mind and believing he is one of the richest man on earth want to give everyone big chunk of his fortune. He dies on 17 February 1788. Often regarded as one of the best portraitists of his time, La Tour attempts and succeeds in showing the soul of his sitters on their appearance. One of the difference with other portraitists is that with La Tour, his subjects ‘eyes do not necessarily seem to watch outbound but often hold an expression that invite the public to watch inside them to understand the profundity of their charm and character. The light in the pastel along with the models ‘expression and diminutive smile propose a complicity that one accepts unintentionally. La Tour did not bother to sign his works. He knew that pastels did not have the consideration than oil had but is so skilled that he is able to prove that pastels could capture the large spectrum and diversity of the human heart through people’s face.